:host { --enviso-primary-color: #FF8A21; --enviso-secondary-color: #FF8A21; font-family: 'boijmans-font', Arial, Helvetica,sans-serif; } .enviso-basket-button-wrapper { position: relative; top: 5px; } .enviso-btn { font-size: 22px; } .enviso-basket-button-items-amount { font-size: 12px; line-height: 1; background: #F18700; color: white; border-radius: 50%; width: 24px; height: 24px; min-width: 0; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; text-align: center; font-weight: bold; padding: 0; top: -13px; right: -12px; } .enviso-dialog-content { overflow: auto; } Previous Next Facebook Instagram Twitter Pinterest Tiktok Linkedin Back to top
Thaegenes en Chariclea tussen gedode en gewonde piraten op de oever van de Nijlmonding ('Na de schipbreuk')

Thaegenes en Chariclea tussen gedode en gewonde piraten op de oever van de Nijlmonding ('Na de schipbreuk')

Abraham Bloemaert (in circa 1624-1625)

Vraag maar raak

Laden...

Bedankt, je vraag is verzonden.

Helaas, er is iets mis gegaan met het verzenden van je vraag. Probeer het aub nog eens.

High-res beeldmateriaal aanvragen

Meer informatie

Specificaties

Titel Thaegenes en Chariclea tussen gedode en gewonde piraten op de oever van de Nijlmonding ('Na de schipbreuk')
Materiaal en techniek Zwart krijt, pen en penseel in bruine inkt, bruin gewassen, wit gehoogd, kaderlijnen met de pen in zwarte inkt (gedeeltelijk weggesneden)
Objectsoort
Tekening > Tweedimensionaal object > Kunstvoorwerp
Locatie Dit object is in het depot
Afmetingen Hoogte 250 mm
Breedte 293 mm
Makers Tekenaar: Abraham Bloemaert
Inventarisnummer MB 1980/T 2 (PK)
Credits Aankoop 1980
Collectie Tekeningen & Prenten
Verwervingsdatum 1980
Vervaardigingsdatum in circa 1624-1625
Signatuur geen
Watermerk coat of arms, unidentified (quartered: bend in 2 and 3, rampant lion in 1 and 4, but difficult to distinguish), initials BL in ligature beneath (75 x 58mm, on P4-5 from the left, right under the heads of the main characters; vH, 12P, fine, bifolio), the same type of watermark is present in a drawing by Jacob Matham in Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, inv. JMat 2, and fragmented in one by Cornelis Claesz. Van Wieringen, inv. CCW 1): coat of arms (mirror image) of an unidentified family (Baden-Hochberg according to Briquet vol. 1, p. 89, but this family has another coat of arms)(quarterly: bend in 1 and 4, rampant lion in 2, half of an emerging lion on waves in 3), initials BL in ligature beneath, similar to Briquet 1075 (probably papermaker BL in Ettlingen, below Karlsruhe, county of Baden, Germany; doc. 1589-1601 but used well into the 17th c., a.o. doc. Utrecht 1589-1602, Leiden 1597; Briquet vol. I, p. 89)) and Heawood 602-604 (with other initials; doc. resp. Holland 1604, 1611, 1627) and 605 (without the bend but with the same initials BL in ligature; doc. Holland 1611). [AE]
Conditie twee verticale vouwen in het midden, foxing, verkleuring ten gevolge van voormalig passepartout
Inscripties geen
Merkteken geen
Tentoonstellingen Utrecht/Schwerin 2011, nr. 50
Externe tentoonstellingen Abraham Bloemaert. Een grootheid uit de Gouden Eeuw (2011)
Abraham Bloemaert - Een grootheid uit de Gouden Eeuw (2012)
Onderzoek Toon onderzoek Nederlandse tekeningen uit de vijftiende en zestiende eeuw
Literatuur The Hague 1997-1998, pp. 104-105, fig. 2; Plomp 2001, p. 202, nr. 20; Bolten 2007, nr. 554; Elen 2011, pp. 32-37, fig. 16; Collection Catalogue 2012 (online)
Materiaal
Object
Techniek
Gehoogd > Schildertechniek > Techniek > Materiaal en techniek
Bruin gewassen > Wassen > Gewassen > Tekentechniek > Techniek > Materiaal en techniek
Geografische herkomst Nederland > West-Europa > Europa

Entry bestandscatalogus Vroeg Nederlandse tekeningen uit de 15e en 16e eeuw

Auteur: Albert J. Elen

Deze beschrijving is momenteel alleen beschikbaar in het Engels.

Depicted is the first scene from the love story of Theagenes and Chariclea, an ancient romance related in the novel Historia Aethiopica (An Ethiopian Story) by the third-century (AD) greek writer Heliodorus of Emesa, which was first published in print in 1534 and was very popular since, though rarely depicted by artists.1 Chariclea was an Ethiopian princess, though unaware of this. Because she had a white skin at birth the queen, fearing accusation of adultery by her husband, exposed her as a baby. The royal foundling was raised by a priest of Apollo called Charicles, who took her first to Egypt and then to Delphi in Greece. Grown up she there fell in love with Theagenes, descendant of the famous Greec hero Achilles, during the Pythian Games (a precursor of the Olympic Games). They ran off together and after several adventures, Chariclea being pursued by other men and desperately trying to protect her virginity, they were eventually married.

The novel actually starts in the middle of the story, when at sunrise Egyptian robbers are looking for their daily prey from a cliff on the shores the Nile estuary, called Heracleot. When they look down to the beach they are surprised by a fascinating scene unfolding before their eyes: among men lying dead or mortally wounded a beautiful young lady is ministering to a wounded young man. They are the sole survivors of a fierce fight with their revolting crew which suddenly started during a banquet on the beach, after their ship had been blown off course during a storm and had been cast upon this shore. Dishes are still on the table, precious tableware is lying around. The ship, carrying the rich possessions of Theagenes and Charicleia that tempted their crew, is lying on the beach in the background.

Bloemaert closely followed the detailed description of this extraordinary scene in the first two paragraphs of the first chapter of the novel, depicting Chariclea with quiver and bow, with which she had just slain their assailants. Bloemaert has also drawn the second group of thieves in the distance, who already started looting the ship, which at that moment was yet to happen. That group of thieves then scared off the other group of robbers on the cliff and subsequently took Theagenes and Chariclea as prisoners. In the distance, on the slope of the hill, a figure is seated with hands wrought together; this is their companion Calasiris praying to the gods for help, a detail actually not mentioned at that point in the novel.

This drawing is the only surviving preparatory drawing for one of three paintings depicting scenes of the love story of Theagenes and Chariclea, which Bloemaert painted between 1625 and 1628 for Stadholder Frederik Hendrik's country estate of Huis Honselaarsdijk just south of The Hague, which was then still under construction. The painting, dated 1625, is now in Potsdam (ill. 1).2 The three canvases, which do not have the same dimensions, the Shipwreck being the smallest, were probably intended as chimney-pieces in different rooms, as a recurring theme alluding to the prince and his wife Amalia van Solms.3 Thus they are not an actual cycle, which, moreover, would only have been complete if the closing theme of the marriage of the love couple had also been painted.4 The two other paintings depict other scenes from the love story: Theagenes Receiving the Palm of Honour from Chariclea, dated 1626 (Mauritshuis, The Hague)5 and Theagenes and Chariclea Arriving at the Pythian Games, dated 1628 (formerly Schloss Schwed, lost during WW II).6 These two scenes chronologically precede our scene, but are recounted later on in the novel, which starts half way. 7

The Rotterdam sheet is the vidimus for the painting, which is the finished composition drawing presented to the patron for approval.8 Bloemaert must also have made studies for parts of the composition and, in addition, may have drawn on figure studies in his workshop portfolios. This is particularly likely to be true of the sprawled figures, which appear in similar but slightly different poses in numerous drawings and prints, such as a study sheet produced thirty years earlier in Bremen.9 At the start of his career Bloemaert had painted a similar scene of carnage in the monumental Slaying of the Niobids (1591), which he must have had in mind, possibly having the old figure studies of lying male nudes ready to hand, when composing the Shipwreck scene.10

The composition of the vidimus was largely reproduced in the painting, but the sail above the table was eliminated, the sailing ship in the background was modernised (probably at the patron's request) and vegetation was added to the bare cliff. Smaller details such as shells replaced the jar in the foreground. Adding the shells Bloemaert on second reading decided to follow closer Heliodorus’ description “another [brigand lying dead] was hurt with the shells of fishes, whereof on the shore there was great plenty” and he also added arrows (“most of all were slain with arrows”), which are also lacking in the drawing.11 Bloemaert undoubtedly based the minor elements of the composition on separate preparatory studies that are no. longer known to us and he relied on his studio repertory.

fig. 1 Abraham Bloemaert. Theagenes and Chariclea Amidst Slain Mariners (after the Shipwreck), 1625. Berlin-Brandenburg, Stiftung Staatliche Schlösser und Gärten (Potsdam, Schloss Sanssouci)

Noten

1 Bloemaert, who has stayed in Paris for three years, probably read the French edition by Jacques Amyot (Paris 1547), of which 36 reprints were published over two centuries.

2 Roethlisberger 1993, vol. 1, no. 424, vol. 2, fig 594; Utrecht/Schwerin 2011, under no. 50, col.ill.

3 Actually, the painting of Theagenes and Chariclea after the shipwreck may never have reached Honselaarsdijk, as it was mentioned in an inventory of the prince’s Noordeinde Palace in The Hague in 1632, just seven years after it was finished; see The Hague 1997-1998, p. 107.

4 It may also be possible that a larger cycle was indeed considered but eventually proved too ambitious and was cut short for lack of time and/or money.

5 Roethlisberger 1993, vol. 1, no. 425, vol. 2, fig 595; Utrecht/Schwerin 2011, under no. 50, col.ill.

6 Roethlisberger 1993, vol. 1, no. 451, vol. 2, fig 624.

7 These two scenes are recounted in respectively the fourth and the third chapter of the novel. Seelig (Utrecht/Schwerin 2011, p. 136) expresses his surprise that this is the first scene of the love story depicted by Bloemaert, probably not realizing that the novel actually opens in the middle of the story. The beach scene is described at the start of chapter 1.

8 Bolten 2007, vol. 1, p. 195, under no. 554, wrongly characterises this drawing as a sketch.

9 Bolten 2007, vol. 1, no. 997 (which can be dated c. 1591–1593). In addition to this sheet, Bolten mentions a preliminary drawing (c. 1590–1595) used for the reclining figure in the lower right-hand corner (Bolten 2007, vol. 1, no. 1131, ill.; see also Bolten 1993). This drawing is in reverse relative to the painting. It seems probable that Bloemaert made drawings of the same recumbent model in a variety of poses and that the specific one used as a basis for the reclining figure in the vidimus has not been preserved. Bloemaert used these models again later on, in 1632, for two similar nude male figures lying in the foreground in his signed and dated picture drawing The Avenging Angel Goes Through the Land of Israel in the Dresden print room, inv. no. C 7060 (Bolten 2007, no. 51; Ketelsen/Hahn 2011, pp 80-81, ill.)

10 Roethlisberger 1993, vol. 1, no. 13, vol. 2, ill 29, col.pl.II.

11 The source used for the novel is The Æthiopica: Heliodorus - An Aethiopian Romance,  translated by Thomas Underdowne (1587), revised and partly rewritten by F. A. Wright in 1869 [with additional corrections in the 2006 online edition by S. Rhoads, www.elfinspell.com].

Toon onderzoek Nederlandse tekeningen uit de vijftiende en zestiende eeuw
Toon catalogustekst Verberg catalogustekst

Alles over de maker

Abraham Bloemaert

Gorinchem 1566 - Utrecht 1651

Bekijk het volledige profiel